Closing RFE objections on "Leading role"
Key answer
- elements of the criterion are not covered
The officer says the evidence does not match the plain language and does not show the role, its leading or critical nature, and the organization all at once.
- no specific examples of impact
The letters and materials do not provide specific, detailed, and probative information about how exactly the role was leading or critical.
- the role is not proven to be leading or critical
The officer does not see that the actual role performed was leading or critically important for the organization or department.
- The organization's reputation was not proven
The evidence does not show that the organization, establishment, division, or department had a distinguished reputation.
- Weak recommendation letters
The support letters do not contain enough specifics or come from individuals whose statements do not confirm an organization-level role.
- The documents are not tied to the role
Certificates, interviews, or other materials are not accompanied by an explanation of what leading/critical role the applicant played for the organization itself.
- Criterion counted, but there is a final merits risk
Even with a criteria met finding, the officer may separately assess the weight of the evidence at Final Merits.
Nearby
Reference information and community experience, not legal advice. The AAO figures are lessons from appeals, not approval odds; fees and timelines change - verify on uscis.gov.