Skip to content

Should I start EB-1A right after getting an O-1?

Key answer

A common strategy: the O-1 buys three years of legal status while the EB-1A case matures. O-1 is de facto tolerant of immigrant intent, and the community knows cases of O-1 approvals even after an EB-1 denial. Many practitioners advise strengthening the case for about a year before filing EB-1.

Community answers

The answers below are translated from the original Russian - the language of the community chats.

  • With an O-1, I will have three years to resolve the green card issue, which is why we chose this plan - first move, then finalize EB-1.

  • The lawyers I consulted advised to budget at least a year to strengthen the EB-1 case and to apply from outside the USA - but this is situational advice, not a rule.

  • I was advised that applying for O-1 after a denial on EB-1 is not a problem: O-1 essentially allows for dual intent. The chances at the consulate are slightly lower, but there is no ban.

  • If the case is borderline, O-1 may be a backup option with a lower threshold to legalize quickly, while EB-1A is the goal for a green card when there is enough evidence for a higher standard. Many first do O-1, then EB-1A. It is better to assess whether the profile pulls for EB-1A right away during a consultation with a lawyer, as opinions on borderline cases vary.

The answers are anonymized community experience from the public chats, not legal advice. Officers may decide similar cases differently.

Sources

Related on this site

Similar questions

A reference page built from community experience, not legal advice. Requirements and practice change - verify on uscis.gov.

Did this answer help?