Skip to content

CodepointConf Chicago (jury, winner): an award for O-1 and EB-1A

Award

A reference card from our catalog.

HackathonTier 3codepointconf.com

From the organisation's official site

What the organisation itself states on its site codepointconf.com. Paraphrased, checked Oct 2, 2026.

Organiser
The conference is organised by the AITEX association.
Frequency
Conference on March 14, 2026 in Arlington Heights, Illinois, USA, in person with an option to attend and present online.
Who can enter
Speakers apply through a form; the organisers review all submissions.
How winners are chosen
The best talks are recognised for clarity, practical value and audience impact; winners are announced at the end of the event.
Jury
The judges page lists 5 people (engineers, a design manager, an IT company founder); they evaluate and review the conference talks.
How jurors are chosen
The site does not say how judges are recruited; the site form is for attendees and speakers. Review committee members themselves also receive awards (e.g. Outstanding Technical Judgment).
Categories
The awards page shows four awards: two for talks (Outstanding Technical Presentation, Most Valuable Insights) and two for review committee members.
  • The site contradicts itself: one place says a one-day event (March 14), the header says March 14-15, 2026; the awards text names other categories (Excellence in AI, Audience Choice).

Source: the organisation's site codepointconf.com (pages /, /awards, /judges), checked Oct 2, 2026; the version on the site applies.

What officers look at: 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(i) - who grants it and how winners are selected

What officers look at: 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)(iv) - whose work was judged and how it is documented

CodepointConf Chicago (jury, winner) counts under the awards criterion if it is given for merit in your field, not for participation: the officer looks at selectivity and the awarding body.

The "Awards" criterion: what USCIS requires and how to meet itOpen the full catalog

Similar (Hackathon)

Documents and templates from the library

Reference information, not legal advice and not a USCIS decision: the final assessment is the officer's.

Why "Awards" gets refused

Accepted in 14% of challenged petitions (25 of 184); not an approval rate.

The award’s field does not match the field you are filing in, or is worded so that the link is not obvious.

All refusal grounds and the sample