American Impact Review: does a paper here count for EB-1A and O-1?
The journal's publisher, Global Talent Foundation Inc., is affiliated with this site.
Key answer
Facts from open sources
- Founded
- 2026 [Wikidata P571]
- Publisher
- Global Talent Foundation [Wikidata P123]
- ISSN
- 3071-124X [own site]
- ISSN-L
- 3071-124X [OpenAlex]
- Works in OpenAlex
- 76 [OpenAlex]
- Indexing (as the site states)
- DOI, Crossref [own site]
Collected automatically from the sources shown, checked 2026-09-09; not a USCIS assessment.
A paper in American Impact Review goes to the authorship criterion if it is yours and substantive and the journal has reach and indexing: the reputation of American Impact Review carries no weight without your contribution.
The "Authorship" criterion: what USCIS requires and how to meet itOpen the full catalogSimilar (USA)
FAQ
- What do community chats say about "American Impact Review"?
- Public chats mentioned "American Impact Review" 11 times (2026): 1 positive, 1 negative, 8 neutral (a count as of 2026-09-10, not a rating; quotes below).
- What is known about "American Impact Review" from open sources?
- Founded: 2026 (Wikidata P571); Publisher: Global Talent Foundation (Wikidata P123); ISSN: 3071-124X (own site); ISSN-L: 3071-124X (OpenAlex); Works in OpenAlex: 76 (OpenAlex); Indexing (as the site states): DOI, Crossref (own site); checked 2026-09-09, source links on the page.
Documents and templates from the library
EB-2 NIW exhibit of seven peer-reviewed publicationsTemplate1 page anonymized access on request
Exhibit 14: Peer Review of Conference Papers (NIW)Template1 page anonymized access on request
Exhibit 12.1: Elsevier Book Series Page - Authorship Evidence (NIW)Template1 page anonymized access on request
List of approved peer-reviewed journalsSample1279 pages anonymized access on request
Mentions of American Impact Review in community chats
11 mentions in 2026· 1 1neutral 8, questions 1
A count of mentions in public chats as of 2026-09-10, not a rating: one message is one mention, and the tone is classified automatically.
Personal opinions of community members from public discussions, selected automatically and unverified; not legal advice. The organisation may reply through the contact page.
Reference information, not legal advice and not a USCIS decision: the final assessment is the officer's.
Why "Scholarly authorship" gets refused
Accepted in 44% of challenged petitions (86 of 196); not an approval rate.
The articles are not shown to be scholarly in nature. Columns, blog posts and round-ups do not satisfy this criterion.
All refusal grounds and the sample