Opposition to motion to dismiss in O-1A delay case
Updated: Author: Alina Kanametova
Plaintiffs’ response opposing defendants’ motion to dismiss in a D.C. district court case over delayed O-1A and O-3 visa processing. It says the principal…
About this document
Plaintiffs’ response opposing defendants’ motion to dismiss in a D.C. district court case over delayed O-1A and O-3 visa processing. It says the principal applicant and derivative applicants completed the required steps, were interviewed, and then were placed into section 221(g) administrative processing for over 19 months. The filing argues the claims concern failure to complete final adjudication, not re-adjudication.
Key points
- Opposes dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).
- Concerns a pending O-1A NIV for the principal applicant and O-3 NIVs for the derivative applicants.
- Says USCIS approved the I-129 petition before consular processing.
- States the applicants filed DS-160s, paid fees, and attended a consular interview.
- After interview, the principal applicant received a section 221(g) non-final administrative processing notice.
- Alleges final processing has been delayed for over 19 months without explanation.
- Argues defendants have a nondiscretionary duty to adjudicate visa applications within a reasonable time.
- Contends the complaint is about delay in final adjudication, not re-adjudication of the visa.
What is inside
- Introduction
- Background
- Legal Standard
- Argument
- Conclusion
When it helps
Serves as a merits brief opposing dismissal in a visa-delay lawsuit. It is used to frame the case as an unreasonable-delay and nondiscretionary-duty dispute over final adjudication after consular interview and section 221(g) processing.
Source: Community (anonymized). The material opens on the site. Reference material, not legal advice.
Need access beyond the daily limit?
You can open the full file right in the viewer above - up to 4 files a day once your profile is complete. Need more, or is your profile not ready yet? Request direct access and an admin will grant it.
Related materials
- USCIS Policy Memo PM-602-0005.1 - Evidence Evaluation Methodology for I-140 Petitions (Auto-Translated)Guides
- USCIS memo on INA 245(k) for EB AOSGuides
- USCIS Vaccine Requirements by Age for Civil Surgeons - Reference TableGuides
- Vaccine Requirements for Panel Physicians (April 2025) - Consular ProcessingGuides
- USCIS hold memo for U4U CHNV FRP parole requestsGuides
- USCIS Memorandum: Administrative Hold on Benefit Requests Filed by U4U Parolees (Feb 2025)Guides