Skip to content

RFE objection "Plain language elements not met": how it was answered

Key answer

The officer notes that the criterion requires authorship, scholarly nature, and publication in an appropriate source at the same time. Break the evidence down by the three elements of the criterion: authorship, scholarly material, and qualifying publication/media.

The objection belongs to the "Authorship" criterion. Below is what the community did to close it: the order of steps, the documents that were attached and the wording that went into the answer.

Steps that closed it

  1. Add a brief plain language summary for each article: purpose, method, result, author's contribution
  2. State the author's role clearly: idea, design, analysis, experiments, writing, data verification
  3. Explain the significance without jargon: what problem the work solves and who can use the result
  4. Connect the articles to the authorship criterion: show that this was not participation, but a substantial intellectual contribution
  5. Remove or spell out specialized terms, abbreviations, and metrics

What was attached

  • List of publications with DOIs or links
  • Article pages showing authorship
  • Letters from coauthors or supervisors describing the contribution
  • Citations, reviews, use of the results
  • Brief plain-language summaries for each key article

How the answer was worded

The article studied problem X. The author developed approach Y, performed data analysis, and prepared key sections of the text. The result showed improvement Z and can be applied to solve a practical problem in field A.

A pattern, not a template to copy: the wording only works with your own facts behind it.

Where to check this

Other objections on this criterion

Reference information and community experience, not legal advice. The AAO figures are lessons from appeals, not approval odds; fees and timelines change - verify on uscis.gov.