Skip to content

RFE objection "The scale within the field specifically has not been proven": how it was answered

Key answer

The officer requires proof of the contribution's significance not to the employer or project, but to the field of endeavor. Add evidence that the contribution affected the industry or professional community beyond the petitioner and their organizations.

The objection belongs to the "Original contribution" criterion. Below is what the community did to close it: the order of steps, the documents that were attached and the wording that went into the answer.

Steps that closed it

  1. Define the field precisely: area, subfield, type of tasks, and circle of specialists
  2. Show that the contribution affected not only the employer, but practice in the field
  3. Link each result to external use: implementations, citations, standards, products, methods
  4. Remove evidence of the company's general success if it does not prove contribution specifically to the field
  5. Add independent letters from experts in the field with a specific description of the impact
  6. Formulate the causal chain: problem in the field, your contribution, measurable effect, external recognition
  7. Collect scale metrics: number of users, organizations, publications, implementations, regions, industry applications
  8. Make a mapping table: contribution, evidence, who uses it, why it matters to the field

What was attached

  • Independent expert letters without personal stake
  • Documents showing implementation of the solution by external organizations
  • Citations, links, mentions in professional materials
  • Publications, presentations, technical reports, industry documents
  • Usage and distribution metrics
  • Comparison with previous approaches and explanation of the improvement
  • Confirmation that the result is used as a method, tool, or benchmark in the field

How the answer was worded

Instead of saying "the applicant made a significant contribution to the project," state: "the applicant developed an approach that solves a common problem in field; the approach was independently adopted by outside organizations, used by specialists in field, and led to measurable improvement in key metrics, as confirmed by independent letters, implementation materials, and external links."

A pattern, not a template to copy: the wording only works with your own facts behind it.

Where to check this

Other objections on this criterion

Reference information and community experience, not legal advice. The AAO figures are lessons from appeals, not approval odds; fees and timelines change - verify on uscis.gov.