Skip to content

RFE objection "No major significance": how it was answered

Key answer

The officer's primary conclusion is that the contribution was not shown to have major significance for the field as a whole. Add independent evidence of impact on the field: implementations, citations, industry effects, metrics, and external confirmations.

The objection belongs to the "Original contribution" criterion. Below is what the community did to close it: the order of steps, the documents that were attached and the wording that went into the answer.

Steps that closed it

  1. Focus the case on one strong original contribution, not general experience
  2. Show that the contribution was new to the field, product, method, or market
  3. Connect the contribution to a measurable effect: growth, savings, scaling, risk reduction, implementation
  4. Prove that the result depended on the petitioner, not just the team
  5. Add independent confirmation from experts, clients, partners, or industry sources
  6. Show the contribution spreading beyond one employer: implementation, citations, licensing, standards, reuse
  7. Remove weak claims without metrics and replace them with facts, documents, and before-and-after comparisons

What was attached

  • letters describing your specific role and the uniqueness of the contribution
  • impact metrics before and after implementation
  • documents confirming implementation of the solution
  • publications, reports, presentations, or technical materials
  • reviews from independent specialists
  • data on commercial, technical, or industry impact
  • comparison with existing approaches and an explanation of novelty

How the answer was worded

The petitioner developed an original approach to solving an important industry problem that was implemented in several independent projects and led to measurable improvement in key indicators. His personal role is confirmed by documents, independent letters, and materials showing that the contribution was not a routine duty but had a substantial impact on practice in the relevant field.

A pattern, not a template to copy: the wording only works with your own facts behind it.

Where to check this

Other objections on this criterion

Reference information and community experience, not legal advice. The AAO figures are lessons from appeals, not approval odds; fees and timelines change - verify on uscis.gov.