What is a NOIR and how does it differ from a NOID?
Key answer
Breakdown from the data
The answers below are translated from the original Russian - the language of the community chats.
The sequence: the petition is approved, the case moves to the consulate, questions arise there, and the petition is returned to the USCIS service center. USCIS then either reaffirms its decision or starts revocation and issues a NOIR. Community observation is that reaffirmation is more common than revocation.
The practical difference is that a NOIR has to be answered on an already-assembled record, often more than a year after filing, when some evidence has gone stale. Keep source files and recommender contacts until the visa is in hand, not until approval.
This breakdown is built on real USCIS notices and public sources, linked below. It is reference material, not legal advice: officers decide similar cases differently.
Four notices that are easy to confuse
RFE (Request for Evidence) - a request for proof on a case still under adjudication. No decision has been made; you are asked to send more material.
NOID (Notice of Intent to Deny) - an intention to refuse. The officer is already leaning towards denial and gives you a last chance to argue. A heavier stage than an RFE: the case against you is already articulated.
NOIR (Notice of Intent to Revoke) - an intention to revoke a petition that has ALREADY BEEN APPROVED. It arrives after approval, most often after the case has come back from a consulate.
NOIR is sometimes confused with the acronym NOIA. In the I-140 context it means revocation of an approval, nothing else.
How a case gets as far as a NOIR
The typical sequence: the petition is approved, the documents go to the National Visa Center and on to the consulate. At the interview or during screening, questions arise: discrepancies between documents, doubts about authenticity, new information about the employer or the applicant.
A consulate cannot overturn a USCIS decision. It returns the petition to the service center with its doubts set out. The decision is then back with USCIS: the agency either reaffirms the approval or opens revocation proceedings and issues a NOIR.
Community members report that reaffirmation is more common than revocation, but the return itself stretches the timeline out noticeably - the process runs for months.
How answering a NOIR differs from answering an RFE
The main difference is time. A NOIR arrives a year or more after filing, when part of the evidence has gone stale: referees' contact details have changed, links to publications are dead, the employer may be different. Rebuilding the material turns out to be harder than assembling it the first time.
The second difference is the subject of the argument. An RFE debates whether the evidence is sufficient under the criteria. A NOIR usually turns on a specific consular doubt: the authenticity of a document, the reality of a position, an inconsistency in dates or facts.
A practical conclusion worth accepting in advance: keep the source files of the whole packet and the referees' contact details until the visa is in the passport, not until the petition is approved. Cheap insurance that pays off in exactly this scenario.
Sources
- USCIS: petitions returned by consular offices
The official description of the return procedure and what follows - reaffirmation or revocation.
- 8 CFR 204.5 - the I-140 regulation
- USCIS: EB-1 employment-based first preference
The agency overview of EB-1A, EB-1B and EB-1C.
Related on this site
Similar questions
- When does the premium processing clock start?
- How to transliterate a name on USCIS forms?
- Which category is denied most often?
- Which precedents do officers cite in an RFE or denial?
- How does EB-1 differ from EB-2, and which to pick?
- Do the pages of a petition need to be numbered?
- Do conference abstracts count as publications?
A reference page built from community experience, not legal advice. Requirements and practice change - verify on uscis.gov.
Did this answer help?