Skip to content

Do online exhibitions and galleries count for the criterion?

Key answer

Yes, the exhibitions criterion does not require a physical gallery: members have successfully cited online galleries and contest finalist catalogs. But the officer looks at curation and the venue's standing - in a real RFE, venues without selection were not accepted as a "display of work". Offline shows read stronger; online usually goes in as reinforcement.

Community answers

The answers below are translated from the original Russian - the language of the community chats.

  • The answer that photographers are given in chats: if your works are displayed in an online gallery or printed in a finalist catalog - this is the exhibition criterion. The key is selection: the display must be curated, not self-uploaded.

  • From a real RFE: the officer wrote that 'the festivals where works were exhibited' do not, by themselves, prove display of work - it was necessary to explain separately that this was specifically an art exhibition with a selection process. The phrasing in the petition matters.

  • Practice: those who have offline exhibitions add online shows as a complement, not a replacement. A case without physical displays looks weaker for this criterion.

  • In niche fields (beauty, digital art), participants use online competitions and expos with submissions - this is also an option if there is a jury and a catalog of participants.

The answers are anonymized community experience from the public chats, not legal advice. Officers may decide similar cases differently.

Why "Exhibitions" gets refused

Accepted in 44% of challenged petitions (26 of 59); not an approval rate.

It is not shown that the work displayed was your own work product.

All refusal grounds and the sample

Sources

Related on this site

Similar questions

A reference page built from community experience, not legal advice. Requirements and practice change - verify on uscis.gov.

Did this answer help?