Exhibit lists from real NIW and EB-1A petitions
Updated: Author: Alina Kanametova
«4 packages, 193 exhibit entries as they appear in the documents.»
Source
- Document
- Four real packages from the community archive: two full NIW packages, an exhibit index of an NIW RFE response and an EB-1A template based on an approved 2023 petition
- Issuer
- Community chat archive; names of people and their employers replaced by roles
- Date
- 2013-2023
- Size
- 30 paras · 7k chars + 25 paras · 3k chars + 120 paras · 14k chars + 43 paras · 15k chars
Document structure
- NIW package 1 (physics researcher, H-1B holder): 26 exhibit groups
- NIW package 2 (biosystems engineer, F-1 holder): 20 exhibit groups
- NIW RFE response (automotive program manager): exhibit index
- EB-1A template based on an approved 2023 petition (UX/UI designer): exhibits by criterion
NIW package 1: physics researcher (H-1B holder), 26 exhibit groups
- • Forms and Fee
- A.1 Filing Fee per Form I-140 - $700
- A.2 Form I-140
- A.3 Form ETA-9089 (in duplicate)
- B. Petition Cover Letter
- 1. Advanced Degree Professional
- 2. Substantial Merit and National Importance
- 3. I am Well Positioned to Advance the Proposed Endeavor
- 4. It Would Be Beneficial to the USA to Waive the Labor Certification
- 5. Nonimmigrant Status of the applicant and the spouse
- 6. Summary
- Exhibit 1: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 1, Aerospace Engineer / Software Lead, the employer
- Exhibit 1.1: Recommender 1’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 2: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 2, Lead Systems Engineering & Integration, the employer
- Exhibit 2.1: Recommender 2’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 3: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 3, Professor and Chairperson of Physics Department, the university
- Exhibit 3.1: Recommender 3’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 4: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 4, Technical Fellow, the company
- Exhibit 4.1: Recommender 4’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 5: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 5, Senior Physicist / Professor of Space Research, the university, the employer
- Exhibit 5.1: Recommender 5’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 6: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 6, Principal Research Physicist, the university
- Exhibit 6.1: Recommender 6’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 7: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 7, Program Director, the company
- Exhibit 7.1: Recommender 7’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 8: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 1, Senior Research Scientist, the university
- Exhibit 8.1: Recommender 1’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 9: Advanced Degrees
- Exhibit 9.1: PhD Degree from the university in European City, European Country #2
- Exhibit 9.2: Credential Evaluation Report of PhD Degree (Credential Evaluation Company)
- Exhibit 9.3: Master’s Degree from the university in European City, European Country #2
- Exhibit 9.4: Credential Evaluation Report of Master’s Degree (Credential Evaluation Company)
- Exhibit 9.5: QS World University Rankings - the university in European City
- Exhibit 10: Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 11: Letter Confirming Work Experience at the Physics Laboratory (PL) – the spouse
- Exhibit 12: Letter Requesting Publication about Radimage Detectors – Recommender 2, Editor in Elsevier Publisher
- Exhibit 12.1: About book Advances in Imaging & Electron Physics
- Exhibit 13: Documents Regarding the agency – Principal Investigator of Two Projects
- Exhibit 13.1: Project Proposal “Calibration Source” – price at page 1, Recommender 3’s position at pages 3, 13, 19
- Exhibit 13.2: Final Report of Project “Calibration Source” – written by Recommender 3
- Exhibit 13.3: Part of European Country #2 Space Agency Annual Report – Factsheet about Project “Calibration Source”
- Exhibit 13.4: Project Contract “Portable Calibration Source” – price at page 6, Recommender 3’s position at page 12
- Exhibit 13.5: About the agency
- Exhibit 14: Documents Regarding Reviewing of Scientific Articles for the Proceedings of the International Summer School Nuclear Physics Methods and Accelerators in Biology and Medicine
- Exhibit 14.1: Letter Confirming Reviewing of Scientific Articles – Recommender 2, Physical Laboratory
- Exhibit 14.2: American Institute of Physics - AIP Conference Proceedings Series No. 1204
- Exhibit 14.3: About International Summer School Nuclear Physics Methods and Accelerators in Biology and Medicine
- Exhibit 15: Documents Regarding IEEE NSS-MIC Award (Trainee Grant)
- Exhibit 15.1: Letter Confirming Receiving of Trainee Grant – Recommender 4, General Chair of 2010 IEEE NSS-MIC
- Exhibit 15.2: About 2010 IEEE NSS-MIC – Recommender 4
- Exhibit 16: Documents Regarding Work Experience at the employer and CERN, GFA Scholarship Award
- Exhibit 16.1: Letter Confirming Work Experience at the employer and CERN (on the applicant's project) – Recommender 1, Scientific Director, the employer
- Exhibit 16.2: Evaluation Letter about Work Experience at the employer and CERN – Recommender 2, Senior Scientist, the employer
- Exhibit 16.3: Letter Confirming Receiving of GFA Scholarship Award – the applicant and the spouse, the employer
- Exhibit 16.4: About the employer
- Exhibit 16.5: About CERN – general data, Large Hadron Collider (LHC), ALICE
- Exhibit 17: Letter Confirming Requested Advising for Filming Documentary for PBS TV Channel
- Exhibit 18: Member of Organizing Committee – Conference on Radiation Detectors (CRD) 2009
- Exhibit 19: Citations
- Exhibit 19.1: Citations – Google Scholar
- Exhibit 19.2: Citations – Scopus
- Exhibit 19.3: Citations – Web of Knowledge
- Exhibit 20: Publications
- Exhibit 20.1: Peer-reviewed Publications
- Exhibit 20.2: Conference Proceedings Publications
- Exhibit 20.3: Abstract of PhD Thesis “Development of new methods”
- Exhibit 20.4: Abstract of Master’s Thesis “Master’s Thesis about Detectors”
- Exhibit 20.5: Peer-reviewed Journal Rankings - SCImago
- Exhibit 21: Detimage Collaboration – Member Institutions
- Exhibit 22: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - Reducing Radiation from Medical X-rays
- Exhibit 23: U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) - Domestic Nuclear Detection Office Should Improve Planning to Better Address Gaps and Vulnerabilities
- Exhibit 24: Documents Regarding Employment at Physics Department, U.S. Regionally Accredited University #2
- Exhibit 24.1: Current Employment Contract – Research Associate 2 (Valid from 01/02/2013)
- Exhibit 24.2: All Paychecks – Period 02/2012 – 05/2013
- Exhibit 25: Documents Regarding Nonimmigrant Status H-1B
- Exhibit 25.1: Passport
- Exhibit 25.2: Current I-797A Approval Notice H-1B and I-94 – Valid 01/02/2013 – 01/01/2016
- Exhibit 25.3: Previous I-797B Approval Notice H-1B – Valid 01/02/2012 – 01/01/2013
- Exhibit 25.4: Previous I-94 – Valid 01/21/2012 – 01/01/2013
- Exhibit 25.5: Previous Visa Sticker H-1B – Valid 01/11/2012 – 01/01/2013
- Exhibit 26: Documents Regarding Dependent’s Nonimmigrant Status H-4 (the spouse) and Marriage Certificate
- Exhibit 26.1: Passport
- Exhibit 26.2: Current I-797A Approval Notice H-4 and I-94 – Valid 01/02/2013 – 01/01/2016
- Exhibit 26.3: Previous I-94 – Valid 01/21/2012 – 01/01/2013
- Exhibit 26.4: Previous Visa Sticker H-4 – Valid 01/11/2012 – 01/01/2013
- Exhibit 26.5: Marriage Certificate
Entries as they appear in the document; names of people and their employers replaced by roles.
NIW package 2: biosystems engineer (F-1 holder), 20 exhibit groups
- • Forms and Fee
- A.1 Filing Fee per Form I-140 - $700
- A.2 Form I-140
- A.3 Form ETA-9089 (in duplicate)
- B. Petition Cover Letter
- 1. Advanced Degree Professional
- 2. Substantial Merit and National Importance
- 3. I am well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
- 4. It would be beneficial to the USA to waive the Labor Certification
- 5. My nonimmigrant status
- 6. Conclusion
- Exhibit 1: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 1, Title/Position, the institution (Independent Advisory Opinion)
- Exhibit 1.1: Recommender 1’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 2: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 2, Title/Position, the institution (Independent Advisory Opinion)
- Exhibit 2.1: Recommender 2’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 3: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 3, Title/Position, the institution (Independent Advisory Opinion)
- Exhibit 3.1: Recommender 3’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 4: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 4, Title/Position, the institution Exhibit 4.1: Recommender 4’s Biosketch
- Exhibit 5: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 5, Title/Position, the institution
- Exhibit 5.1: Recommender 5’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 6: Letter of Recommendation – Recommender 6, Title/Position, the institution Exhibit 6.1: Recommender 6’s Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 7: Advanced Degree – Ph.D.
- Exhibit 7.1: Copy of Diploma of Ph.D. in Biosystems Engineering from the university Exhibit 7.2: Copy of Transcripts of Ph.D. in Biosystems Engineering from the university
- Exhibit 8: Curriculum Vitae
- Exhibit 9: Relevance of research for the U.S. National Interest
- Exhibit 9A: Bioeconomy Blueprint WH Press Release
- Exhibit 9B: Screenshot of BETO website Exhibit 9C: Biomass Energy Program Fact Sheet
- Exhibit 9D: Biopesticide Oversight and Registration at the US EPA
- Exhibit 9E: The Role of Biopesticides in Sustainability Feeding the 9 Billion Global Populations
- Exhibit 10: Three most recent Paychecks from the employer
- Exhibit 11: Letter of Support for NIW from the employer’s Position/Title of HR
- Exhibit 12: Median salary of peers
- Exhibit 12.1: Screenshot from CareerOneStop portal Exhibit 12.2: Screenshot from GlassDoor.com
- Exhibit 13: 2018 W-2
- Exhibit 14: the employer initial Offer Letter and latest Promotion Letter
- Exhibit 15: Citation Record by Google Scholar
- Exhibit 16: Copies of peer-reviewed publications co-authored
- Exhibit 17: Evidence of Serving as Reviewer in Journals
- Exhibit 18: Ranking information of peer-reviewed journals
- Exhibit 19: Key Contributor Award Letter and Check
- Exhibit 20: Documents regarding Current Nonimmigrant status F-1
- Exhibit 20.1: Passport
- Exhibit 20.2: Current I-20 and I-94
- Exhibit 20.3: F-1 visa stamp
- Exhibit 20.4: Travel History
- Exhibit 20.5: Current EAD card (STEM OPT)
- Exhibit 20.6: Copy of form I-797C, Notice of Action for H—1B application
- Exhibit 21: Documents Regarding Past Nonimmigrant status
- Exhibit 25.1: Copy of past J-1 visa
- Exhibit 25.2: Copy of past H-1B visa (the university)
Entries as they appear in the document; names of people and their employers replaced by roles.
NIW RFE response: exhibit index (automotive program manager)
- Exhibit 1.4: Evidence of Receiving a Higher Salary than Peers in the Field
- Exhibit 3: Article – New Study Reveals Automotive Program Managers Must Be Superheroes
- Exhibit 4: Fact Sheet the Biden Harris Electric Vehicle Charging Action Plan
- Exhibit 5: Fact Sheet Biden Administration Advances Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
- Exhibit 6: Article – Electric Vehicles the Key Technology to Decarbonize Road Transport
- Exhibit 6.1: Article – EV Policy Developments
- Exhibit 7: Article – EPA - Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Exhibit 8: Report – Move to Zero-Emission Cars Would Save Nearly 90,000 Lives
- Exhibit 9: Article – Harvard - Use of Electric Cars Could Improve Health Outcomes
- Exhibit 10: Article – Oil and Petroleum Products Explained
- Exhibit 11: Article – Saving Money with Electric Vehicles
- Exhibit 12: Report – U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Exhibit 13: Report – The Automotive Industry as Being Essential to the Economy
- Exhibit 13.1: Article – 2023 Global Automotive Consumer Study
- Exhibit 14: Article – Project Management and Automotive Industry Innovation
- Exhibit 15: Article – Purpose-built Management Suite For Automotive Program Managers
- Exhibit 16: Article – Program Management Job Growth and Talent Gap
- Exhibit 17: Article – Program Management 2022 Jobs Report
- Exhibit 18: Article – McKinsey, Winning the Race for Talent
- Exhibit 27: Job Posting, Demand for PMs in the Automotive Industry
- Exhibit 30: Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
- Exhibit 31: My Targeted Executive MBA
Entries as they appear in the document; names of people and their employers replaced by roles.
EB-1A template based on an approved 2023 petition: exhibits by criterion
- Exhibit 1.1: Screenshot of the O*NET OnLine (onetonline.org) official website confirming demand of the category) About the applicant
- Exhibit 1.2: Bachelor’s Degree Diploma
- Exhibit 1.3: Certificate of training,
- Exhibit 1.4: Certificate of Completion of the
- Exhibit 2.1.1: 2020 Design Award Winner Diploma
- Exhibit 2.1.2: 2021 Certificate of Excellence
- Exhibit 2.1.3: Images of the winning design
- Exhibit 2.1.4: LinkedIn comment of Recommender 1
- Exhibit 2.1.5: Photographs of the applicant
- Exhibit 2.1.7: Screenshot with previous winner of the award
- Exhibit 2.1.8: Screenshot with previous winner of the award
- Exhibit 2.1.9: Screenshot of criteria used to grant the prizes or awards Jury Members: First. Name, about Recommender 2
- Exhibit 2.1.10: Screenshot of the Grand jury panel page Second. Name, about Recommender 3
- Exhibit 2.1.11: Screenshot of the Grand jury panel page • Award Description
- Exhibit 2.2.1: Award
- Exhibit 3.1.1: Screenshot from official
- Exhibit 3.1.2: Advisory Opinion letter
- Exhibit 3.1.3: Certificate Requirements: Key member: • the applicant
- Exhibit 4.1.1: Screenshot from the official website with interview of the applicant
- Exhibit 4.1.2: Screenshot with statistic information of the www
- Exhibit 5.1.1: Certificate
- Exhibit 5.1.2: Screenshot with specification of Jury selection requirements. Jury Selection:
- Exhibit 6.1.1: Projects presentation created by the applicant
- Exhibit 6.1.2: Confirmation letter
- Exhibit 6.1.3: Contract with the employer
- Exhibit 6.1.4: Letter of support from Recommender 1
- Exhibit 6.1.5: Letter of support from Recommender 2
- Exhibit 6.1.6: Letter of support from Recommender 3
- Exhibit 6.1.7: Review from Recommender 4
- Exhibit 4.4.1: above, confirms the lead or starring participant role of the applicant
- Exhibit 6.2.1: Certificate of Appreciation from the employer
- Exhibit 6.2.2: Screenshot of one of the lectures of the applicant
- Exhibit 10.1: Offer Letter from the employer
- Exhibit 10.2: Letter of intent from the employer
- Exhibit 10.3: Screenshot of the Email message from the hiring manager of the employer
Entries as they appear in the document; names of people and their employers replaced by roles.
What the chats ask about this topic
- 2×What is an exhibition?
- 2×Is exhibition a criterion?
- 2×Exhibition for science
- 1×Hello everyone! Please advise, who manually entered scientific articles into Google Scholar, how did you save them as exhibits later? The profile page with all articles or each one separately?
- 1×What evidence is needed to meet the exhibition criterion?
Where people go wrong - from the chats
- mistakeTeaching a subject at a university by itself usually does not satisfy the exhibitions or public display of work criterion. That fact may instead support criteria for professional recognition, contributions, judging, authorship, or a leading role, depending on the evidence.
Rules and tips from the chats
- tipWith your attorney, it is worth putting in writing in advance that the petition and exhibits are not filed without the candidate's approval of the contents of the documents, letters, and evidence.
- tipIn the petition, it is better to organize the evidence systematically: number the exhibits, add clear captions, a table of contents, and explanations. Do not overload the petition with hundreds of pages for weak criteria - 3 well-documented criteria look stronger.
- tipA petition cover letter can be lengthy, but structure matters more: clearly organize the evidence by criterion, avoid overloading it with repetition, and make the exhibit navigation convenient for the officer.
- ruleThe exhibitions criterion is debated for professionals outside the arts; the practical rule is to check in advance whether the event format fits the immigration understanding of the criterion, rather than relying only on the word exhibition as used in one's own field.
Cases from the community
unknown · sports · outcome not stated
A coach with a sports background tried to use competitions as evidence under the exhibitions or showcases criterion.
What they did: Submitted sports competitions under the logic of the criterion related to exhibitions, but that approach was not credited; similar achievements were suggested to be tied more strongly to contributions to the field, for example through students' successes.
EB-1A · architecture and development · outcome not stated
The applicant prepared an EB-1A on their own and believed they met most of the criteria, including participation in a major project at a professional exhibition and recognition of the project.
What they did: Built the case independently, replaced the weak awards criterion with the exhibitions criterion, and prepared evidence across several areas.
Questions and answers on the site
Distilled from the public community chats, anonymised; corpus as of June 2026. These are participants' observations, not legal advice and not USCIS statistics.
Terms: exhibit-index
Related reading
Other dossiers
Excerpts are shown as they appear in the documents; translations are not official. Reference information, not legal advice and not a USCIS decision. uscis.gov.