AAO precedent on EB-2 NIW test
Updated: Author: Alina Kanametova
DeepL machine translation of the landmark AAO decision (27 December 2016) that established the Dhanasar three-prong test for EB-2 NIW. Helps Russian-speaking...
Official source of the document ↗verified 2026-09-09
About this document
A Russian translation of the AAO precedent decision Matter of Dhanasar, published at 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). It explains the NIW framework, overturns Matter of New York State Dept. of Transportation, and states a new three-part test for waiving the job offer and labor certification requirements under EB-2. The text also summarizes the case outcome: the appeal was sustained and the petition approved.
Key points
- AAO states a new NIW test with three prongs: substantial merit and national importance, strong position to advance the endeavor, and benefit to the U.S. overall.
- The decision overturns Matter of New York State Dept. of Transportation as the prior NIW framework.
- It explains that EB-2 normally requires a U.S. job offer and a labor certification from the Department of Labor.
- The text describes labor certification as showing no sufficient, willing, qualified, and available U.S. workers at the worksite.
- It says the labor certification filing must use the real minimum job requirements, not requirements tailored to the foreign national.
- USCIS may waive the job offer and labor certification if the agency finds it is in the national interest.
- The case outcome stated here is that the appeal was sustained and the petition approved.
- The applicant in the case was a self-petitioning researcher and teacher in aerospace engineering.
What is inside
- Citation and decision date
- Holding and case result
- I. Legal framework
- EB-2 and labor certification
- NIW waiver authority
- NYSDOT framework analysis
- II. New analytical framework
When it helps
This serves as precedent-level authority for the EB-2 NIW standard. It shows the legal test USCIS uses to evaluate whether the job offer and labor certification requirements should be waived.
Source: USCIS / official source. The material opens on the site. Reference material, not legal advice.
This document has a dossier on the site
Related materials
- USCIS Policy Memo PM-602-0005.1 - Evidence Evaluation Methodology for I-140 Petitions (Auto-Translated)Guides
- USCIS memo on INA 245(k) for EB AOSGuides
- EB-2 NIW expert opinion letterGuides
- EB-2 NIW AAO denial of civil engineer appealGuides
- EB-2 NIW AAO Dhanasar appeal decision, 2023Guides
- EB-2 NIW Dhanasar Practice PointerGuides