Skip to content
All specialists and reviews
Lawyer license verifiedpracticing attorney

Curtis Morrison

Кёртис Моррисон (Red Eagle Law)

Curtis Morrison is a California attorney and the founder of Red Eagle Law, L.C. (Bonsall). The State Bar of California lists him since 2018 with Active status. The firm focuses on federal immigration lawsuits: individual and group mandamus suits over prolonged administrative processing, and class actions, for example over the pause in DV lottery visas. In the administrative processing chats he is one of the most frequent names: people write both about processing that ended soon after a suit and about suits the court dismissed.

Immigration attorney (Bonsall, California): federal lawsuits over prolonged administrative processing and USCIS delays (mandamus), group and class actions, including over DV visas.

Red Eagle Law, L.C. (Bonsall, California) · State Bar of California No. 321106, Active, admitted in 2018 · the firm focuses on federal immigration lawsuits.

Verified profile

Attorney license: Active, admitted 6/6/2018verify

Red Eagle Law, L.C., 5256 S. Mission Road, Suite 135, Bonsall, CA 92003

Visas: Mandamus lawsuits · Administrative processing. Languages: English.

Website

to open the official site, LinkedIn and contacts. Free, one tap.

Attorney licence: register check

Licence checked on Nov 11, 2026 in the official register: The State Bar of California

Name on record:
Curtis Lee Morrison
State:
California
State Bar of California licence number:
321106
Admitted:
06.06.2018
Status:
Active
City on record:
Bonsall, CA

We matched the name, the state and the office city against the register entry. Status can change: check it again via the link before you sign anything.

Alternatives to Curtis Morrison

Other lawyers in our directory that handle the same visas, by the number of reviews on this site:

  • Jennifer Nimer - 7 reviews (4 positive, 3 negative), visas: Mandamus lawsuits · Administrative processing
  • Goldstein Immigration Lawyers - 4 reviews (2 positive, 2 negative), visas: Mandamus lawsuits · Administrative processing

Ordered only by review count; this is not a ranking or a recommendation. The full list

Pros

  • +State Bar of California licence since 2018, Active status (per the register)
  • +Deep experience with federal lawsuits specifically: individual, group and class actions
  • +Per reviews, processing ended for many people one to three months after the suit was filed

What to watch for

  • -A suit does not guarantee a visa: there are reports where the court granted the government's motion to dismiss
  • -Per some reviews, suits filed long ago can stall for a long time (unverified)
  • -A new suit after a loss is paid for again, so it is worth clarifying the terms in advance
Leave a review

Contacts are open to signed-in users with a profile of 60% or more. This is anti-spam, not paid access - signing in and the profile are free.

Reviews7+ / 4-

A summary from open sources (o1eb1, Avvo) and community chats, plus proof-backed user reviews. This is personal experience, not a legal assessment; the specialist has the right to reply. Contested claims are marked “unverified”.

Positive (7)

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)August 2026

    An H-1B visa went into administrative processing after an interview in Astana. Six months later a mandamus suit was filed with this firm; about two months after that the processing ended and the visa was issued. Payment was in three stages.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)February 2026

    An L-2 visa went into administrative processing after an interview in Berlin, and letters to a senator and the embassy did not help. Six months later a mandamus suit was filed in California, and two months after that a letter came saying processing was over. The author is sure the suit helped.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)January 2026

    A child was born into the family during administrative processing, and on the firm's advice they went to the consulate in Mexico to add the child to the case. The first visit ended in a refusal, but the firm reached the right people, two weeks later the family was invited again, and the child was added. The author thanks the attorney and the team.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)November 2025

    After 16 months of administrative processing the author filed an individual mandamus suit. In his words the attorney was attentive and professional, unlike earlier lawyers. The government objected and asked to dismiss the suit, and the firm kept fighting.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)October 2025

    A business EB-1A in processing after an interview in Warsaw. Almost a year and a half later a group mandamus suit was filed, and three and a half months after that processing ended. When the embassy demanded a new interview and new fees, the firm's lawyers called it a mistake and brought in the government's counsel; a week later the embassy admitted the error.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)August 2025

    An O-1 visa, with processing after an interview in Yerevan that lasted over a year and a half. A group mandamus suit was filed in June 2025, and in early August the status changed and the passport was requested.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)February 2025

    An F-1 visa in processing after an interview in Astana. The mandamus suit was filed in early January, and at the end of February, before the government's response deadline, a letter came saying processing was over.

Negative (4)

  • Negative from the community (Telegram) unverifiedOctober 2026

    The author filed an individual mandamus lawsuit after six months of administrative processing. More than a year after the briefing ended, the judge found the wait still reasonable and dismissed the suit. The author considers the money wasted.

  • Negative from the community (Telegram) unverifiedAugust 2026

    The O-1 petition was approved, but after the interview in Belgrade the visa went into processing. In summer 2024 a mandamus suit was filed with this firm in Texas; in spring 2025 the court granted the government's motion to dismiss.

  • Negative from the community (Telegram) unverifiedJuly 2026

    The mandamus suit was filed long ago but the case is not moving, and the consular status has not changed for a year and a half. The author thinks the firm is now busier with class actions.

  • Negative from the community (Telegram) unverifiedJune 2026

    A group mandamus suit for F-1 and J-1 visas (nine people, physicists, chemists and biologists) was filed in Washington, D.C. The court granted the government's motion to dismiss; by then only one member had cleared processing.

Sources

Leave a review

Telegram sign-in is required (it blocks fake reviews - we alone see who submitted). The review is anonymous by default; you can choose to show your name. Proof of working with the provider is mandatory: moderators verify it privately and the document is never published.

Curtis Morrison

Filled automatically - you are reviewing this specialist

Lawyer

Contract, correspondence, invoice or petition - all private, moderators only.

Related

Other lawyers

Next in the directory: Andrew Iatsenko - specialist

Unofficial, community-assembled site: not affiliated with USCIS or any US government agency. Always double-check everything on the official uscis.gov and travel.state.gov. Not legal advice. This is a description of the role and a recap of community discussions, not a vetting of people or an endorsement of any specialist: check everyone yourself and do not pay strangers upfront.