Goldstein Immigration Lawyers
Goldstein Immigration Lawyers is an immigration firm with offices in Los Angeles and Boston; per the firm's site, the responsible attorney Joshua L. Goldstein is licensed in New York, Massachusetts, California and Washington. Its main focus is mandamus suits over USCIS delays and consular administrative processing; the firm also handles marriage green cards and naturalization. In the administrative processing chats it is named among the three most frequent firms for such suits: people praise the speed and service, but there are also reports of suits the court dismissed.
Immigration law firm (Los Angeles, California; Boston, Massachusetts): mandamus lawsuits over USCIS delays and consular administrative processing, plus marriage green cards and naturalization.
Goldstein Immigration Lawyers · responsible attorney Joshua L. Goldstein, licensed in New York, Massachusetts, California and Washington (per the firm's site) · offices in Los Angeles and Boston · practice limited to US immigration law.
Verified profile
Goldstein Immigration Lawyers, 611 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 317, Los Angeles, CA 90017
Visas: Mandamus lawsuits · Administrative processing. Languages: English.
to open the official site, LinkedIn and contacts. Free, one tap.
Alternatives to Goldstein Immigration Lawyers
Other lawyers in our directory that handle the same visas, by the number of reviews on this site:
- Curtis Morrison - 11 reviews (7 positive, 4 negative), visas: Mandamus lawsuits · Administrative processing
- Jennifer Nimer - 7 reviews (4 positive, 3 negative), visas: Mandamus lawsuits · Administrative processing
Ordered only by review count; this is not a ranking or a recommendation. The full list
Pros
- +Focus on mandamus suits, offices in Los Angeles and Boston
- +Per reviews, work starts right after payment, replies come within a day and clients are kept informed
- +Per clients, the response to the government's motion to dismiss is included in the price
What to watch for
- -A suit does not guarantee a visa: one review describes the court siding with the government
- -Per clients, getting money back if the visa comes earlier is almost impossible, since most of the work is done at the start (unverified)
Contacts are open to signed-in users with a profile of 60% or more. This is anti-spam, not paid access - signing in and the profile are free.
Reviews2+ / 2-
A summary from open sources (o1eb1, Avvo) and community chats, plus proof-backed user reviews. This is personal experience, not a legal assessment; the specialist has the right to reply. Contested claims are marked “unverified”.
Positive (2)
- Positive from the community (Telegram)March 2026
A family visa in administrative processing after an interview in Warsaw. The mandamus suit was filed in late November 2025; two months later the government asked to stay the case, and a few days after that a letter came from the embassy. The author liked the firm's work a lot: fast and client-focused.
- Positive from the community (Telegram)July 2024
Immigrant visas for two, processing after an interview in Montreal; the mandamus suit was filed around day 200. They took a long time to pick the firm: it is among the most expensive, but the response to the government's motion was included. The firm worked fast, replied within a day and kept them informed, and the visas were approved two days before the government's deadline. The author notes that getting money back if the visa comes earlier is almost impossible.
Negative (2)
- Negative from the community (Telegram) unverifiedNovember 2025
A mandamus suit for an EB-1A and a tourist visa was filed in December 2024. While the suit was being drafted the firm sent daily progress updates, but the government moved to dismiss, and in summer 2025 the court found the reasonable waiting time had not yet passed. After that the firm sent a letter by post and did not answer the question about a second suit.
- Negative from the community (Telegram) unverifiedMarch 2025
The author wrote to the firm over a messenger, and they declined the case right away, after asking again what he had already written in the first message.
Sources
- 1.Official site - Goldstein Immigration Lawyers
- 2.Community - Telegram chats on talent visas
Leave a review
Telegram sign-in is required (it blocks fake reviews - we alone see who submitted). The review is anonymous by default; you can choose to show your name. Proof of working with the provider is mandatory: moderators verify it privately and the document is never published.
Filled automatically - you are reviewing this specialist
Contract, correspondence, invoice or petition - all private, moderators only.