Skip to content
All specialists and reviews
Lawyer from real chatspracticing attorney

Vitalii Maliuk

Виталий Малюк (Arvian Law Firm)

Vitalii Maliuk is an immigration attorney and the founder of Arvian Law Firm, with offices in Irvine (California) and Chesterfield (Missouri). The firm's site gives his Missouri licence No. 73573; US immigration law is federal, so such cases are handled nationwide. The firm works on EB-1A and EB-2 NIW green cards, O-1 and L-1 visas, political asylum and family immigration, and its site and consultations are available in Russian. The community chats have many reports of approvals, including after an RFE and in sports cases, but also sharp criticism: that clients barely talk to the attorney himself and that a field was chosen wrongly.

Immigration attorney (Irvine, California; Chesterfield, Missouri): EB-1A and EB-2 NIW green cards, O-1 and L-1 visas, adjustment of status, political asylum and family immigration.

Arvian Law Firm LLC · founder Vitalii Maliuk, Missouri attorney licence No. 73573 (per the firm's site) · offices in Irvine (California) and Chesterfield (Missouri) · site and consultations in Russian.

Verified profile

Arvian Law Firm LLC, 300 Spectrum Center Dr, Floor 4, Irvine, CA 92618

Visas: EB-1 · EB-2 NIW · O-1. Languages: Russian, English.

Website

to open the official site, LinkedIn and contacts. Free, one tap.

Alternatives to Vitalii Maliuk

Other lawyers in our directory that handle the same visas, by the number of reviews on this site:

  • Victoria Ledeneva - 25 reviews (16 positive, 9 negative), visas: O-1 · EB-2 NIW
  • Aya Baltabek - 24 reviews (13 positive, 11 negative), visas: O-1 · EB-1 · EB-2 NIW
  • Viktoria Bloomberg - 21 reviews (14 positive, 7 negative), visas: O-1 · EB-2 NIW
  • Victoria Shelegina - 20 reviews (14 positive, 6 negative), visas: O-1 · EB-1 · EB-2 NIW
  • Victoria Chen - 20 reviews (10 positive, 10 negative), visas: EB-2 NIW · EB-1 · O-1

Ordered only by review count; this is not a ranking or a recommendation. The full list

Pros

  • +Per reviews, the first consultation is free and consultations during the work are set up quickly
  • +Many reports of EB-1A and EB-2 NIW approvals, including after an RFE
  • +Site and communication in Russian

What to watch for

  • -Per some reviews, contact goes through paralegals and managers and the client rarely meets the attorney (unverified)
  • -One review describes a wrongly chosen field and an RFE because of it; the firm disagreed
Leave a review

Contacts are open to signed-in users with a profile of 60% or more. This is anti-spam, not paid access - signing in and the profile are free.

Reviews8+ / 1-

A summary from open sources (o1eb1, Avvo) and community chats, plus proof-backed user reviews. This is personal experience, not a legal assessment; the specialist has the right to reply. Contested claims are marked “unverified”.

Positive (8)

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)July 2026

    The EB-1A was approved after an RFE; the author notes convenient contact through Telegram and quick replies from the staff. The firm then filed the I-485, and after an interview in Los Angeles the family received green cards.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)June 2026

    An EB-1A in sport (judo and sambo). The first consultation was free, consultations during the work were set up quickly, and the athlete got a discount. At first the officer accepted none of the criteria, but the firm prepared a detailed RFE response and the petition was approved.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)June 2026

    The author filed for EB-1A with this firm: the work was clear and well organised, the I-140 was approved, and then the author and her husband received green cards.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)May 2026

    The author worked with this attorney on a work visa and was pleased. In her words he also handles L-1A visas.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)May 2026

    The first consultation was free, and everything about the case was explained in detail. The author recommends them.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)December 2025

    A sport EB-1A: 8 of the 10 criteria were documented at filing. The RFE only asked about plans to keep working in the US; the firm prepared a structured response, and the I-140 was approved. The author recommends the firm to athletes and coaches.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)July 2025

    An EB-2 NIW in software and ML: filed with premium processing, an RFE came, and after the response and a pause in processing the petition was approved.

  • Positive from the community (Telegram)July 2025

    The EB-1A was approved six days after filing; the status adjustment took about six months (there was a request about the earlier student documents). The author recommends them: everything was professional.

Negative (1)

  • Negative from the community (Telegram) unverifiedDecember 2025

    The author filed for EB-1A and writes that in a year of work the attorney never contacted her, everything went through paralegals and managers, and the field was chosen wrongly: per the RFE, the officer assessed her as a business executive rather than in fashion. She moved to another attorney, the RFE response was redone, and the petition was approved. The firm disagreed with her account in the chat and gave its own version.

Sources

Leave a review

Telegram sign-in is required (it blocks fake reviews - we alone see who submitted). The review is anonymous by default; you can choose to show your name. Proof of working with the provider is mandatory: moderators verify it privately and the document is never published.

Vitalii Maliuk

Filled automatically - you are reviewing this specialist

Lawyer

Contract, correspondence, invoice or petition - all private, moderators only.

Related

Other lawyers

Unofficial, community-assembled site: not affiliated with USCIS or any US government agency. Always double-check everything on the official uscis.gov and travel.state.gov. Not legal advice. This is a description of the role and a recap of community discussions, not a vetting of people or an endorsement of any specialist: check everyone yourself and do not pay strangers upfront.