Music (Musician, Composer, Music Producer)
AAO appeal decision on the EB-1A talent visa
Updated: Author: Alina Kanametova
This is a real, anonymized AAO appeal decision on the EB-1A immigrant visa, in the field of Music (Musician, Composer, Music Producer) (Arts), 2021. The appeal was appeal sustained, and on the final-merits determination the petitioner met the standard. Of the regulatory criteria, 5 were counted: Awards, Membership, Published material about you, Judging, Commercial success.
What this case shows
Bottom line: the appeal was sustained - a rare outcome in the appeals base. Of the 5 EB-1A criteria claimed, 5 were counted. The petitioner also passed the final-merits totality assessment - both the criteria and the overall extraordinary-ability standard.
EB-1A criteria in this case
- Awardscounted
- Membershipcounted
- Published material about youcounted
- Judgingcounted
- Original contributionnot claimed
- Scholarly authorshipnot claimed
- Exhibitionsnot claimed
- Leading rolenot claimed
- High remunerationnot claimed
- Commercial successcounted
- Comparable evidencenot claimed
The Arts field in the database: 343 appeals
Outcomes in this field: 12 sustained, 52 remanded, 279 dismissed. How the AAO ruled in this field on the criteria argued in this case:
| Criterion | In this case | Counted in the field | How objections were answered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Awards | counted | 44 of 236 (19%) | breakdowns for this criterion (7) |
| Membership | counted | 15 of 126 (12%) | breakdowns for this criterion (6) |
| Published material about you | counted | 90 of 242 (37%) | breakdowns for this criterion (7) |
| Judging | counted | 117 of 162 (72%) | breakdowns for this criterion (7) |
| Commercial success | counted | 6 of 53 (11%) | - |
Counted over our base of published AAO decisions; all Arts appeals.
How to read this case
No claimed criterion here is marked "not counted", and the petitioner passed the final-merits totality assessment - one of the rare winning outcomes in the base (AAO appeals are sustained in roughly 3% of cases). Study which criteria were counted and compare them with your own evidence set.
From the AAO decision (source, EN)
The initial denial was based on the conclusion that the record did not establish that the Petitioner had satisfied at least three of the ten initial evidentiary criteria. The AAO found that the Petitioner met five criteria, sustaining the appeal.
The quote summarizes a fragment of the decision; the table above reflects the FINAL status of the criteria across all stages of the case (including ones conceded before the appeal), so the wording may not match one-to-one.
Full AAO decision of August 26, 2021 (PDF, uscis.gov)AAO decisions archive on uscis.gov
FAQ on this case
- Which EB-1A criteria were counted in this case?
- Criteria claimed: 5, counted: 5 (Awards, Membership, Published material about you, Judging, Commercial success).
- How did this appeal end?
- The appeal was sustained - the denial was overturned in the petitioner's favor. A rare outcome: about 3% of our base.
- Did the case reach the final-merits stage?
- Yes, and on the totality assessment the petitioner met the extraordinary-ability standard.